The glass ceiling and MBA’s

During my time working for the Centre for Women’s Enterprise (CWE) at the University of Bedfordshire I frequently had to consider whether the services we provided were accessible to women with childcare responsibilities. This included ensuring that the CWE services were offered during school hours to ensure women with children were able to participate and on occasions, providing a crèche to enable mothers with pre-school children to benefit from business support services.

Will the boat sink the water?

I don’t have the temperament to do a PhD but if there is a me in a parallel universe who is patient, meticulous and detailed she’ll be doing a dissertation on protest and political unrest in rural China.  So even in this universe I’m interested that a protest in a village in Guangdong province is now making international headlines.

Wukan villagers claim that the local government confiscated land for development. This is in one of the wealthiest provinces in the whole of China so the gains from development are enormous. This is not an isolated incident. Skimming off the gains from the sale of land is one of many temptations to poorly paid local government officials and one of the main aggravations to farmers.

China and me

I’m sitting in front of a photograph which shouted China to me before I even looked at the caption.  It’s not the Great Wall or people doing tai chi in a public park, not a Terracotta Warrior or the Water Cube, not the exuberant skyline of Pudong which has sprung from nothing since the 1990’s to be Shanghai’s financial and commercial centre.

What I’m looking at is a close-up of a block of flats and it was The Independent’s picture of the day recently.  It’s a close-up in the sense that you can’t see the ground, the top or either side of the block.  You can clearly see clothes drying at the windows.  Nevertheless, it is distant enough to see 12 floors and probably six apartments on each floor.

The world after email is on its way

It’s clear from the habits of our undergraduates that young people have moved on from email, or have never adopted it in the first place. Teenagers think that email is middle aged and, of course, they cannot conceive of a world without email, instant messaging (IM) or mobile phones at all.

Now the hi-tech services company Atos has announced that it is phasing out email over the next 18 months. Email will go the way of the smoke signal, letter, telex and fax. According to The Independent, Atos will be moving to other tools, including IM, wikis and social networking, including a business-based social networking service called Yammer. The idea is partly to reduce the time spent on useless emails – spam, marketing emails, emails copied to everyone just to cover backs, etc. It is a disruptive, intrusive, demanding medium. Most us aren’t much better at ignoring incoming mail than we at ignoring a ringing phone.

To Google, or not to Google?

I received an email today requesting some information on time differences between the different countries our MBA operates in, to which my reaction was ‘couldn’t Google answer this question?’

After reflecting about this, I started to think about how we go about getting information these days and the effect this has on our interactions with one another.

How social is networking?

I was talking to one of my MBA colleagues this afternoon about networking.  I asked her whether people are organising meetings any better now than they did 20 years or so ago (not that she is old enough to address that question exactly but that was the comparison I was wanting to make).

I remember when a group of us established a branch of the Institute of Marketing (as it was at the time) in Cambridge.  We were all young, the city was quite small then and the viability of the branch was a little fragile so we had to do everything we could to keep people coming to meetings.  We had several people who had the specific task of greeting people and introducing them to someone else.  Nobody was left on their own.  As a committee, we tried to know everyone.  We weren’t a bunch of mates meeting up but a welcoming, professional team running a welcoming, professional event.

What's the point of HS1?

I don’t mean the rail service itself. I understand that bit. I used High Speed 1 to go to the Folkestone Triennial festival this summer and the journey was smooth, comfortable and, as you would expect, fast. It was particularly comfortable as the train wasn’t exactly crowded. The extensive sound-proofing along the route is unfortunate from a passenger’s perspective as you lose views of some beautiful Kent countryside but never mind.

What I mean is that I don’t get the point of the company HS1. I was listening to their CEO, Nicola Shaw, on The Bottom Line on BBC Radio 4 recently and I didn’t get it at all. They don’t own or maintain the track (that’s Railtrack). They don’t run the trains (train operating companies, TOC’s, do that). The key word seemed to be “liaison” and I think that was the problem.